Jump to content

Vitamin D & All-Cause Mortality


Recommended Posts

New research presented at this year’s Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) in Barcelona, Spain (September 16-20, 2019) reveals that vitamin D deficiency is strongly linked to increased mortality, especially in younger and middle-aged people, and is particularly associated with diabetes-related deaths.

 

The study found that vitamin D levels of 10 nmol/L or less were associated with a 2-3 fold increase in risk of death, with the largest effect being observed in patients aged 45 to 60 years (2.9 times increased risk). Levels of 90 nmol/L or greater were associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality of 30-40%, again with the largest effect being found in the 45 to 60-years-old age group (a 40% reduction in risk). No statistically significant associations between vitamin D levels and mortality were observed in patients over the age of 75

 

Full Article

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, STENDEC said:

Impossible to say unfortunately...although, with ubiquitous use of sunscreen, I'm not sure how strong the association between D status and outdoor activity is anymore in the developed world.

 

I guess it is pretty ubiquitous, but it doesn't occur to me since I use it about twice a season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Not really related to mortality but we don't have an all-purpose vitamin D thread.

 

"Our study suggests that for people with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, taking a supplement of vitamin D and calcium is a simple, low-risk way to prevent vertigo from recurring," said Ji-Soo Kim, M.D., Ph.D., of Seoul National University College of Medicine in Korea. "It is especially effective if you have low vitamin D levels to begin with."

 

Article

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...

Very high dosages of vitamin D may delay frailty in old age

 

A small study in mice suggests that a dosage of vitamin D five times the current recommended amount for older adults could slow the development of frailty. However, the researchers now need to confirm this finding in humans.


Doctors currently define a person as “frail” if they display three or more of the following five characteristics:

unexpected weight loss
weak grip strength
self-reported exhaustion
low levels of physical activity
slow walking speed


Frailty tends to increase with age, affecting around half of individuals aged over 85 years. It is associated with disability, loss of independence, and increased rates of mortality. Research suggests that people who have low levels of vitamin D in their blood are more likely to become frail. This is a particularly pressing concern, as up to 1 billion people globally may have insufficient levels.

 

Having adequate levels of vitamin D is associated with a wide range of health benefits, including healthier bones and teeth and stronger immunity to respiratory infections. The body can synthesize its own vitamin D when the skin has exposure to the UV light in sunlight. However, during winter months in higher latitudes, and for people who spend most of their time indoors, the principal sources of vitamin D are diet and supplements.


There is some uncertainty about the amounts of vitamin D a person should consume. The National Academy of Medicine recommend a daily intake of 600 international units (IU) for adults aged 19–70 years and 800 IU per day for individuals aged 70+ years. According to a research group at the Veterans Affairs Western New York Healthcare System and the University at Buffalo — both in Buffalo, NY — these recommendations are largely based on optimizing bone health.

 

They believe that much higher levels are necessary to maintain muscle strength and prevent frailty. Their previous research in “middle-aged” mice suggests that a long-term insufficient intake of vitamin D in middle age may result in an impaired capacity for anaerobic exercise, decreased muscle mass, and increased amounts of adipose, or fat, tissue.

 

Their latest work in mice, which appears in the journal Nutrients, indicates that not getting enough of the vitamin in older age may accelerate the development of frailty. “We found that in aged mice, low levels of vitamin D [resulted] in physical declines, such as reduced grip strength and grip endurance — the ability to sustain a grip — and that they started developing as soon as 1 month after reduction of vitamin D intake,” says first study author Kenneth L. Seldeen, Ph.D. Crucially, vitamin D only protected the mice from these effects when intake was several times higher than the equivalent recommended intake for older adults. “To slow the progression of frailty, it actually took greater amounts of vitamin D than what is currently considered sufficient for a human,” says Seldeen.


The scientists monitored mice aged 24–28 months, which equates to 65–80-year-old humans. At the start of the study, they divided the animals into three groups:

 

insufficient intake of vitamin D (defined as 125 IU per kilogram [kg] of feed)
sufficient intake (1,000 IU per kg of feed)
“hypersufficient” intake (8,000 IU per kg of feed)


Over the next 4 months, they assessed the animals’ physical performance and scored them on five tests of frailty equivalent to those that doctors use to assess humans. By the end of the study period, the mice that had an insufficient or sufficient intake of vitamin D were significantly more frail than they had been at the start of the experiment.

 

By contrast, the mice with a hypersufficient intake were slightly more frail by the end of the study, but the increase was not statistically significant. It is also worth noting that although there was an increase in frailty scores, by the 4-month endpoint, none of the groups of mice met the researchers’ definition of frail. The researchers already recommend that older human adults take a minimum of 2,000 IU of vitamin D per day.

 

“This is particularly important for our frail geriatric patients,” says senior study author Dr. Bruce R. Troen, a professor of medicine. “But based upon our research, we believe that a lifetime of ample vitamin D supplementation will optimize long-term functional capacity and health.” The new study suggests that a maximum daily dosage of 4,000 IU, which the National Academy of Medicine consider the safe upper limit, would be necessary to slow the progression of frailty in old age. A dose of 1 IU is equivalent to 0.025 micrograms (mcg) of vitamin D in a supplement, so 4,000 IU is equivalent to 100 mcg.

 

Original Article

 

 

As an aside, I do wonder how you measure grip strength, an more intriguingly, grip endurance in mice...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

It seems Vitamin D has failed in almost every large RCT's in elderly. That saying " If it really works, it's banned. If it doesn't wok, it's a supplement" rings so true. Some recent trials on Vit D in elderly:

 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2768978

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2478897

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2755300

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...